-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Serve swagger.json on UI over https #90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
fix: Add ProxyFix to serve swagger.json over HTTPs
- Loading branch information
commit d315d5bded6b39b72468bcaa8500323f89e8ebbe
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would call this function
add_fixersand in the commit then I would sayThis is supposed to be registered in the CHANGELOG and provide this node.
You can leave the logged message because it serves to explain what this particular fix is for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the commit message change. But I don't agree with the function name "add_fixers". It seems to general for me. This is a fix for a very specific problem. If later we found we need more fixers, it'll be ok to change the name to "add_fixers". But for now I think we are ok leaving the name of the function specific.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, but that function explains reasons and not what that actual function does. If you want to explain the reasons in a verbose way, better use a logger. But I understand your point on trying to be more specific, so I would name for instance
use_werkzeug_proxy_fix, but whatever name with that idea in mind would do for me.