Load balancing for bittorrent-tracker?

[brooklyn097]

Hi, this could be a dumb question but is there a way to do balancing for the tracker?

Thanks for reading!

[DiegoRBaquero]

Not at the moment as the peers are tracked in memory. Something like redis would need to be the store first

…

On Oct 27, 2018, at 12:41 PM, brooklyn097 ***@***.***> wrote: Hi, this could be a dumb question but is there a way to do balancing for the tracker? Thanks for reading! — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[brooklyn097]

@DiegoRBaquero Thanks for your answer. Btw, is it possible to use 0.0.0.0 address for server listening? I've tried and saw this message on error event when start the application:

bind EINVAL 0.0.0.0:

But I still accessible to /stats page so i don't know whether there is any error cause by this.

[DiegoRBaquero]

Mmmm, it should work, i don't see why not, unless you don't have permission to bind to it.

[brooklyn097]

Yes you’re right! It shown an error but it actually work fine.

[mullerivan]

@brooklyn097 I have a tracker that scale and balance the load on several servers
hit me an email mullerivan@gmail.com

[mrlika]

We decided to create our own open source high-performance implementation of WebTorrent tracker: https://github.com/Novage/wt-tracker

Our tests show that to handle 100k peers (no SSL) it requires 1.2Gb of memory and 50% of a single CPU core.

It is written using uWebSockets.js that allows efficiently process WebSockets connections and optimized algorithms that use less CPU than other similar trackers.

Waiting for your feedback.

[brooklyn097]

We decided to create our own open source high-performance implementation of WebTorrent tracker: https://github.com/Novage/wt-tracker

Our tests show that to handle 100k peers (no SSL) it requires 1.2Gb of memory and 50% of a single CPU core.

It is written using uWebSockets.js that allows efficiently process WebSockets connections and optimized algorithms that use less CPU than other similar trackers.

Waiting for your feedback.

Cool, let's test!!!

[github-actions]

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

[alxhotel]

Closing in favor of #354