Add Entity Diagnostics Dashboard with Smart Suggestions #105
Conversation
pnbruckner
left a comment
pnbruckner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like some previous modifications that were made have been backed out. Can you explain why this has happened? Also, not sure why you changed the use of the EntitySelector into a SelectSelector. As far as the main point of the PR, I haven't had time yet to dig into that. I'm a bit preoccupied right now with some changes I'm working on to a couple of my other integrations. I'll try to spend some time on this in the near future.
Thanks for the suggestion!
| CONF_ENTITY_PICTURE, | ||
| CONF_MAX_SPEED_AGE, | ||
| CONF_REQ_MOVEMENT, | ||
| CONF_SHOW_UNKNOWN_AS_0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are these changes being backed out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was a mistake. I have reversed this hopefully!
| vol.Required(CONF_ENTITY_ID): EntitySelector( | ||
| EntitySelectorConfig( | ||
| include_entities=list(include_entities), multiple=True | ||
| vol.Required(CONF_ENTITY_ID): SelectSelector( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is wrong with the EntitySelector? It shows the friendly name, entity ID, and the entity picture if it has one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was having big problems with the EntitySelector - didn't find it showed the entityID (clearly?) and it was really hard to find the right entity due to a lack of information. SelectSelector makes it super clear both what you're selecting and what IS selected (when reviewing).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well, this is very strange. I'm running two HA systems, my "production" system and a test system. They are both running the same HA Core version and HA Fronted version. Both running the same version of the composite integration. Yet one EntitySelector shows entity IDs and the other doesn't:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure why the EntitySelector is working differently on these two (seemingly otherwise identical) systems, but I don't think that changing this selector should be part of this PR.
| self.options[CONF_END_DRIVING_DELAY] = user_input[ | ||
| CONF_END_DRIVING_DELAY | ||
| ] | ||
| self.options[CONF_END_DRIVING_DELAY] = user_input[CONF_END_DRIVING_DELAY] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why was this change backed out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This formatting change was a mistake. I have reversed this formatting change, hopefully!
- Add comprehensive entity health analysis with reliability scoring - Add smart entity correlation suggestions based on state change timing - Improve UX with friendly names in entity selectors - Add integration source detection for better diagnostics - Add historical data analysis (7-14 day windows) - Add automated warnings for stale or unreliable entities This feature helps users monitor tracked entity health and discover new entities to track through intelligent correlation analysis. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
26tajeen
force-pushed
the
feature/entity-diagnostics
branch
from
018b281 to
e4778b9
Compare
|
addressed concerns :-) |
|
There is still something very wrong with this branch. E.g., config_flow.py now has two definitions of the CompositeConfigFlow class. Also, it's missing the latest commit from the master branch. I think you need to rebase or something. |
|
Oh, also from the last workflow, an error from hassfest: [DEPENDENCIES] Using component recorder but it's not in 'dependencies' or 'after_dependencies' |
3 participants
This PR adds a comprehensive Entity Diagnostics Dashboard to help users monitor the health of their tracked entities and discover new entities to track.
New Features
Technical Details
Benefits