Skip to content

Conversation

@DiegoTinitana
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #163 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 85.39%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #163      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.94%   91.97%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines         708      785      +77     
  Branches       40       45       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          651      722      +71     
- Misses         45       46       +1     
- Partials       12       17       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...-management/store/customer-management.selectors.ts 35.71% <22.22%> (-30.96%) ⬇️
...info/components/create-customer/create-customer.ts 89.47% <75.00%> (-10.53%) ⬇️
...r-management/store/customer-management.reducers.ts 86.95% <85.71%> (-3.05%) ⬇️
...omponents/customer-list/customer-list.component.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ts/projects/components/services/project.service.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/customer-management/services/customer.service.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (+16.66%) ⬆️
...er-management/store/customer-management.actions.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...p/modules/time-clock/pages/time-clock.component.ts 88.88% <100.00%> (+1.79%) ⬆️
.../components/project-list/project-list.component.ts 100.00% <0.00%> (+6.66%) ⬆️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3621932...ed3b575. Read the comment docs.

@enriquezrene enriquezrene merged commit 15d0d4c into master Apr 23, 2020
@enriquezrene enriquezrene deleted the 147_Display_correct_username_fix_test branch April 23, 2020 19:45
let activityIdtoEditMock;
let allActivitiesMock;
let getActivityByIdMock;
let getActivityByIdSelectorMock;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yo can use the variable getActivityByIdMock that is to mock that selector, you don't need to create getActivityByIdSelectorMock

let projectTypeIdToEditMock;
let allProjectTypesMock;
let getProjectTypeByIdMock;
let getProjectTypeByIdSelectorMock;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tha same case. you can use getProjectTypeByIdMock and not create a new variable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants