-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 756
fix: Hide last modified field in agenda when unavailable #7722
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
rjsparks
merged 5 commits into
ietf-tools:main
from
microamp:fix/agenda-updated-19700101
Aug 7, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7f62d7f
test: Update tests to check for Updated field in agenda.txt
microamp e57a0a9
fix: Hide Updated in agenda.txt if too old
microamp 057a800
test: Remove confusing tests on CSV agenda
microamp e71be3e
refactor: Make updated() return None when no valid timestamp found
microamp f121127
refactor: Remove walrus operator
microamp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please double check for me that this isn't prone to race condition. Same with line 314 below. Otherwise, I'm happy to
patchit with a mock return value instead of directly callingmeeting.updated().P.S. I encountered some errors locally earlier, but I haven't been able to reproduce them since, which made me think that it might be related to race condition.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the tests all run in a single thread in a single process for now - you can't be fighting a race.
It would be nice to be able to use threading, but we have dependencies that would have to change (and we would have to rewrite our custom harness around the django test framework.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Maybe it was a bug I accidentally introduced while updating the code locally. It doesn't appear to be there anymore.
Faster tests would be nice in the future.