fix: change trac.ietf.org links to what they redirect to now

ietf/doc/templatetags/ballot_icon.py

@@ -189,8 +189,7 @@ def state_age_colored(doc):
         except IndexError:
             state_datetime = datetime.datetime(1990, 1, 1, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc)
         days = (timezone.now() - state_datetime).days
-        # loosely based on
-        # https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/PublishPath
+        # loosely based on the Publish Path page at the iesg wiki
         if iesg_state == "lc":
             goal1 = 30
             goal2 = 30

ietf/meeting/management/commands/create_test_meeting.py

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 #   can be translated to the newly expanded Constraint objects.
 #
 # This work was done in the context of the new meeting constraints modelling:
-# https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/wiki/MeetingConstraints
+# https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/wiki/MeetingConstraints
 # Note that aside from Constraint objects, as created below, there is also
 # business logic that applies to all sessions, which is to be implemented
 # in the automatic schedule builder.

ietf/meeting/management/commands/generate_schedule.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Copyright The IETF Trust 2021, All Rights Reserved
 # For an overview of this process and context, see:
-# https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/wiki/MeetingConstraints
+# https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/wiki/MeetingConstraints
 from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function, unicode_literals
 
 import calendar

ietf/meeting/tests_js.py

@@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ def test_unassigned_sessions_drop_target_visible_when_empty(self):
     def test_session_constraint_hints(self):
         """Selecting a session should mark conflicting sessions
 
-        To test for recurrence of https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/ticket/3327 need to have some constraints that
+        To test for recurrence of https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/3327 need to have some constraints that
         do not conflict. Testing with only violated constraints does not exercise the code adequately.
         """
         meeting = MeetingFactory(type_id='ietf', date=date_today(), populate_schedule=False)

ietf/redirects/views.py

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ def redirect(request, path="", script=""):
             pass	# it's ok, request didn't have 'command'.
         except:
             pass	# strange exception like the one described in
-                        # https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/ticket/179?
+                        # https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/179
                         # just ignore the command string.
     if cmd is not None:
         remove_args.append('command')

ietf/review/policies.py

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 """
 This file contains policies regarding reviewer queues.
 The policies are documented in more detail on:
-https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/wiki/ReviewerQueuePolicy
+https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/wiki/ReviewerQueuePolicy
 Terminology used here should match terminology used in that document.
 """
 

ietf/review/tests_policies.py

@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ def test_determine_ranking(self):
         self.assertEqual(len(ranking), 2)
         self.assertEqual(ranking[0]['email'], reviewer_high.email())
         self.assertEqual(ranking[1]['email'], reviewer_low.email())
-        # These scores follow the ordering of https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/wiki/ReviewerQueuePolicy,
+        # These scores follow the ordering of https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/wiki/ReviewerQueuePolicy,
         self.assertEqual(ranking[0]['scores'], [ 1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,   0,  0, -1])
         self.assertEqual(ranking[1]['scores'], [-1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -1, -91, -2,  0])
         self.assertEqual(ranking[0]['label'], 'Test Reviewer-high: unavailable indefinitely (Can do follow-ups); requested to be selected next for assignment; reviewed document before; wishes to review document; #2; 1 no response, 1 partially complete, 1 fully completed')

ietf/templates/doc/shepherd_writeup.txt

@@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ to answer all of them.
 [1]: https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/
 [2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4858.html
 [3]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7942.html
-[4]: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-review-tools
+[4]: https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-review-tools
 [5]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8342.html
-[6]: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/iesg/wiki/ExpertTopics
+[6]: https://wiki.ietf.org/group/iesg/ExpertTopics
 [7]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp79
 [8]: https://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/
 [9]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3967.html

ietf/templates/group/group_about_status.html

@@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ <h1>
             <h2>About Status Updates</h2>
             <p>
                 Capturing group status updates in the datatracker allows including them in meeting proceedings. This capability was added to address the IESG request at
-                <a href="https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/ticket/1773">ticket 1773</a>.
+                <a href="https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/1773">ticket 1773</a>.
                 Not all groups are expected to provide status updates. Those that do have historically sent messages by email or have placed them on a wiki. For example, see
                 <a href="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/fo2b3KA47SM4MuQuYj5VIh-Tjok">
                     the Kitten report sent to SAAG for IETF94
                 </a>
                 or the
-                <a href="https://trac.ietf.org/trac/rtg/wiki/IETF94summary">Routing area high level summaries for IETF94</a>.
+                <a href="https://wiki.ietf.org/group/rtg/IETF94summary">Routing area high level summaries for IETF94</a>.
             </p>
         </div>
     {% endif %}

ietf/templates/group/group_about_status_edit.html

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ <h1>
         <h2>About Status Updates</h2>
         <p>
             Capturing group status updates in the datatracker allows including them in meeting proceedings. This capability was added to address the IESG request at
-            <a href="https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/ticket/1773">ticket 1773</a>.
+            <a href="https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/1773">ticket 1773</a>.
             Not all groups are expected to provide status updates. Those that do have historically sent messages by email or have placed them on a wiki. For example, see
             <a href="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/fo2b3KA47SM4MuQuYj5VIh-Tjok">
                 the Kitten report sent to SAAG for IETF94
             </a>
             or the
-            <a href="https://trac.ietf.org/trac/rtg/wiki/IETF94summary">Routing area high level summaries for IETF94</a>.
+            <a href="https://wiki.ietf.org/group/rtg/IETF94summary">Routing area high level summaries for IETF94</a>.
         </p>
     </div>
     <form enctype="multipart/form-data" method="post">