fix: handle names with endings that might parse as versions better

[rjsparks]

fixes #4855

[rjsparks]

@Lars - this is a proposed replacement for #4862.
Either still need tests (and probably a light refactor of the method to make it more testable).

[rjsparks]

Either should also try to fix #4898 at the same time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4897 (528ed15) into main (bc1cba1) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 85.41%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4897   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.47%   88.47%           
=======================================
  Files         296      296           
  Lines       39795    39805   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits        35208    35218   +10     
  Misses       4587     4587           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
ietf/review/utils.py	89.57% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
ietf/doc/utils.py	88.05% <77.77%> (-0.16%)	⬇️
ietf/doc/views_doc.py	91.17% <86.48%> (+0.39%)	⬆️
ietf/doc/models.py	88.16% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
ietf/doc/templatetags/ballot_icon.py	84.82% <100.00%> (ø)
ietf/doc/views_search.py	89.23% <0.00%> (-0.42%)	⬇️
ietf/nomcom/utils.py	91.30% <0.00%> (-0.25%)	⬇️
ietf/person/utils.py	86.98% <0.00%> (+0.59%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[larseggert]

Let's use this one as a base, will close #4862.

[rjsparks]

OK - I've looked more closely and there's not a quick refactor that would let us test the small bit of logic that's in this functions dispatch, there are already tests of the fuzzy matcher that cover what caused the pain that led to this PR, and #4898 is a symptom of the much more general issue with viewing the last version of a draft before it became RFC. Lets solve the last one after the RFC-as-type-of-document major refactor. Thus, I think this simple fix should go forward so the oauth wg's issue gets resolved.