feat: update typesense search index on rfc pub/update

[jennifer-richards]

Does an upsert() with data intended to match what the initial JS index build tool generated. Has been tested against a local typesense instance, but have not done a systematic comparison at all.

Draft while I work on the tests. Ready to go, I think

Things to think about for this or later work: (edit: I think best to take this as a complete feature and leave these for future improvements)

• The _sanitize_text() method in searchindex.py is based on the JS treatment of the content field. I don't completely understand the goals, but it would be good to review this for reasonableness.
• We'll want to add a full rebuild action using typesense's bulk update API. That's not in this PR.
• Datatracker should probably be in charge of the Typesense schema for this collection. That's also not in this PR. For now, it's using what's already set up.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 97.84946% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 88.39%. Comparing base (76fd25a) to head (546e4c0).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
ietf/utils/searchindex.py	96.77%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10575      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.36%   88.39%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         327      328       +1     
  Lines       44092    44204     +112     
==========================================
+ Hits        38964    39073     +109     
- Misses       5128     5131       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[evyncke]

Should requirements.txt be updated to include the "httpx" module ?

[jennifer-richards]

Should requirements.txt be updated to include the "httpx" module ?

Yes, since we refer to it we should include it. I think it should be pulled in automatically as a dependency of the typesense package, though, so it shouldn't actually be required for this to work as intended.

[jennifer-richards]

Should requirements.txt be updated to include the "httpx" module ?

#10678