Skip to content

Default state changes for new revisions don't make sense for all streams #2642

@ietf-svn-bot

Description

@ietf-svn-bot

resolution_fixed type_defect | by rjsparks@nostrum.com


See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mst-lgapi/history/.

Note the transitions to "AD Followup" on new revisions. This is an independent stream document - the notion of "AD Followup" does not make sense.

It would be better for the independent stream to just clear tags and put (leave) the document in the "In ISE Review" state.

Other non-IETF streams need similar adjustment.


Issue migrated from trac:2642 at 2022-03-04 07:04:24 +0000

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions