Skip to content

notification emails on iesg ballots do not contain who made the comment #2428

@ietf-svn-bot

Description

@ietf-svn-bot

resolution_fixed type_defect | by jhaas@pfrc.org


Consider the following datatracker notification for an iesg comment:

This is a notification from the Personal ID list of jhaas@pfrc.org.                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut,                                                                                                                                                                    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut/                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
Change:                                                                                                                                                                                                 
[Ballot comment]                                                                                                                                                                                        
I'm balloting "yes" because I think it's important to publish this. But, like Alvaro,  I wonder why this is not standards track, BCP, or just about anything but informational. So I support his        
DISCUSS, including his the comments on how to resolve it.                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
-1, last paragraph: This references RFC 8174, but does not use the actual 8174 boilerplate. Is there a reason not to do so?                                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                                                        
Best regards,     

It's not possible to tell who made the comment.


Issue migrated from trac:2428 at 2022-03-04 06:36:59 +0000

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions