Review Request e-mail Should Include Requester and ID Name

[ietf-svn-bot]

keyword_easy keyword_sprint resolution_fixed type_enhancement | by aretana@cisco.com

---

When requesting a directorate review using the datatracker, an e-mail is sent to the directorate coordinators, but it doesn't include the name of the ID.

For example (from the request to review draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis):

===
Email was sent at 2017-01-14 09:06:27 PST8PDT

Subject: rtgdir Last Call Review requested
To: "Jonathan Hardwick" jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com, "Jon Hudson" jon.hudson@gmail.com, "Deborah Brungard" db3546@att.com, "Min Ye" amy.yemin@huawei.com, "Tero Kivinen" kivinen@iki.fi, "Xian Zhang" zhang.xian@huawei.com

Also, for tracking purposes, the cc list should at least include draft-*.notify@ietf.org and the requester.

Thanks!

---

Issue migrated from trac:2144 at 2022-03-04 05:39:52 +0000

[ietf-svn-bot]

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed priority from n/a to medium

[ietf-svn-bot]

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed keywords from `` to sprint, easy

[ietf-svn-bot]

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed component from Datatracker: Email sending to review/

[ietf-svn-bot]

@mahoney@nostrum.com commented

---

From b0cbf9a:

Added draftname to email subject for review request (addresses #2144). Commit ready for merge.

[ietf-svn-bot]

@mahoney@nostrum.com commented

---

This bug may need to broken into multiple bugs. I've added the draftname to the subject line, so that part is fixed.

However, power users who make multiple requests on a daily or weekly basis don't want emails sent to them when they make requests. We do want an audit capability, though. Ticket #2074 touches on this.

As for adding .notify@ietf.org, which can be an empty list, to the CC, would it be better instead to use .all@ietf.org, which is populated automatically?

[ietf-svn-bot]

@henrik@levkowetz.com commented

---

From 6ae1379:

Merged in b0cbf9a from mahoney@nostrum.com:
Added draftname to email subject for review request (addresses #2144).

[ietf-svn-bot]

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed status from new to closed

[ietf-svn-bot]

@rjsparks@nostrum.com changed resolution from `` to fixed

[ietf-svn-bot]

@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented

---

If we address the "don't send emails each time, but send a summary later" part of this, we will do it generally, and not for this specific workflow.

I'll open a different ticket (for a related problem) that will subsume the "do we copy draft-name.all@" part of this.