Describe the issue
The example at the top of https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index.txt (which comes from ietf.templates.sync.rfc-index.txt) is incorrect because it shows a See Also (Also RFC1119) when the rfc-index itself does not show any See Alsos:
Current:
For example:
1129 Internet Time Synchronization: The Network Time Protocol. D.L.
Mills. October 1989. (Format: TXT, PS, PDF, HTML) (Also RFC1119)
(Status: INFORMATIONAL) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC1129)
And the actual entry shows (no See Also):
1129 Internet Time Synchronization: The Network Time Protocol. D.L.
Mills. October 1989. (Format: TXT, PS, PDF, HTML) (Status:
INFORMATIONAL) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC1129)
Let's replace the example with a newer STD:
9915 Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6). T. Mrugalski,
B. Volz, M. Richardson, S. Jiang, T. Winters. January 2026. (Format:
HTML, TXT, PDF, XML) (Obsoletes RFC8415) (Also STD102) (Status:
INTERNET STANDARD) (DOI: 10.17487/RFC9915)
Code of Conduct
Describe the issue
The example at the top of https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index.txt (which comes from ietf.templates.sync.rfc-index.txt) is incorrect because it shows a See Also
(Also RFC1119)when the rfc-index itself does not show any See Alsos:Current:
And the actual entry shows (no See Also):
Let's replace the example with a newer STD:
Code of Conduct