Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.0 to 9.26.0#30

Open
Dustin4444 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-25bc63847c85212eef9ed99741b6d836
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade eslint from 8.57.0 to 9.26.0#30
Dustin4444 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-25bc63847c85212eef9ed99741b6d836

Conversation

@Dustin4444

@Dustin4444 Dustin4444 commented Jan 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the yarn.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Uncontrolled Recursion
SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
  623  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.


This change is Reviewable

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jan 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
datatracker Error Error Feb 2, 2026 1:36am

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jan 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-25bc63847c85212eef9ed99741b6d836

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello @Dustin4444, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses a security vulnerability by upgrading the eslint dependency. The upgrade mitigates a medium-severity "Uncontrolled Recursion" issue, enhancing the project's security posture and ensuring code quality checks are performed with a more secure toolchain.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: Upgraded the eslint dependency from version 8.57.0 to 9.26.0 to address a medium-severity "Uncontrolled Recursion" vulnerability (SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420).

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request from Snyk upgrades eslint from version 8 to 9 to address a security vulnerability. While this is a necessary update, it's a major version bump with significant breaking changes that are not fully addressed in this automated PR. The linting process is likely to fail if this is merged as-is. The associated ESLint plugins and configurations need to be updated for compatibility with ESLint v9. Furthermore, the eslint dependency in playwright/package.json has not been updated, and as noted in the PR description, the yarn.lock file also requires a manual update. I've left a more detailed comment on the specific changes.

Comment thread package.json
"browserlist": "latest",
"c8": "9.1.0",
"eslint": "8.57.0",
"eslint": "9.26.0",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

Upgrading to ESLint v9 is a major change that introduces breaking changes. This will likely break your linting setup because other ESLint-related packages are no longer compatible.

For example:

  • eslint-plugin-vue requires ^9.25.0 for ESLint v9.
  • eslint-plugin-n needs to be upgraded to v17.
  • Other packages like eslint-config-standard, eslint-plugin-cypress, and eslint-plugin-import must also be checked for compatibility and upgraded.

Additionally, the eslint dependency in playwright/package.json is still at version 8.57.0 and should be updated as well to maintain consistency.

Due to the complexity of this major version upgrade, I recommend either updating all related packages in this PR or handling the upgrade manually to ensure a smooth transition.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ESLINT-15102420
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants