Skip to content

Commit 973adf2

Browse files
committed
Changelog entry for 6.126.0
- Legacy-Id: 17611
1 parent cf97b72 commit 973adf2

1 file changed

Lines changed: 41 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

changelog

Lines changed: 41 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,44 @@
1+
ietfdb (6.126.0) ietf; urgency=medium
2+
3+
**Groundwork for upcoming automatic scheduling assistance**
4+
5+
* Merged in ^/branch/dash/automatic-scheduler@17395 from sasha@dashcare.nl,
6+
which adds groundwork for upcoming automatic scheduling assistance:
7+
8+
~ Added a management command to create a dummy IETF 999 meeting.
9+
10+
~ Added display of new constraints and joint sessions to agenda builder
11+
interface.
12+
13+
~ The new timerange, time_relation and wg_adjacent constraints, along with
14+
the joint_with_groups option, are now reflected in the special requests
15+
field. This allows them to be taken into account while scheduling
16+
sessions.
17+
18+
~ Clarified the wording in the session request form regarding conflicts
19+
with BOFs.
20+
21+
~ Added support for structured entry and storage of joint sessions in
22+
meetings:
23+
24+
- Also adds additional tests for the SessionForm
25+
- Fixes a javascript error in session requests for non-WG groups,
26+
that could cause incorrect form behaviour.
27+
- Expands the tests added in [17289] a bit.
28+
29+
~ Added support for the timerange, wg_adjacent and time_relation
30+
constraints. This adds three new constraints to the database and
31+
relevant UIs:
32+
33+
- timerange: "This WG can't meet during these timeframes"
34+
- wg_adjacent: "Schedule adjacent to another WG (directly following,
35+
no breaks, same room)"
36+
- time_relation: schedule the two sessions of one WG on subsequent
37+
days or with at least one day seperation
38+
39+
-- Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> 09 Apr 2020 16:25:23 +0000
40+
41+
142
ietfdb (6.125.0) ietf; urgency=medium
243

344
**Various meeting-related fixes and improvements**

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)