Updated independent submission text to point to RFC 5742 instead of 3932

 - Legacy-Id: 1904

Author: pasieronen

ietf/templates/iesg/agenda_doc.html

@@ -55,23 +55,26 @@ <h3>{{ title2 }}</h3>
 {% endif %}
 {% if title2|startswith:"3.3" %}
     <blockquote>
-    The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
-    found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
-    IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
-    &lt;X&gt;, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
-    that publication is harmful to work in WG &lt;X&gt; and recommends
-    not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
-    document violates the IETF procedures for &lt;X&gt; and should
-    therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
-    approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
-    IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
-    therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.<br />
+    The IESG will use RFC 5742 responses: 1) The IESG has concluded
+    that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work; 2)
+    The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done
+    in WG &lt;X&gt;, but this relationship does not prevent
+    publishing; 3) The IESG has concluded that publication could
+    potentially disrupt the IETF work done in WG &lt;X&gt; and
+    recommends not publishing the document at this time; 4) The IESG
+    has concluded that this document violates IETF procedures for
+    &lt;Y&gt; and should therefore not be published without IETF
+    review and IESG approval; or 5) The IESG has concluded that this
+    document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF
+    review and should therefore not be published without IETF review
+    and IESG approval.<br/>
     <br />
-    The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
-    the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
-    Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
-    indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
-    document shepherd.<br />
+    The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the
+    document write-up in the Data Tracker, and the document shepherd
+    may supply text for an IESG Note in the write-up. The Area
+    Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response
+    proposed by the document shepherd and agreement that the IESG
+    should request inclusion of the IESG Note.<br/>
     <br />
     Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
     be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.