forked from adamlaska/datatracker
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathapproval_mail_rfc_editor.txt
More file actions
23 lines (18 loc) · 1.2 KB
/
approval_mail_rfc_editor.txt
File metadata and controls
23 lines (18 loc) · 1.2 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
{% load ietf_filters %}{% load mail_filters %}{% autoescape off %}From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: {{to}}
Cc: {{cc}}
Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for {{ doc.file_tag }}
{% filter wordwrap:78 %}
The IESG has completed a review of <{{ doc.name }}> consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams.
{% if disapproved %}
The IESG recommends that '{{ doc.title }}' {{ doc.file_tag|safe }} NOT be published as {{ doc|std_level_prompt_with_article }}.
{% else %}
The IESG has no problem with the publication of '{{ doc.title }}' {{ doc.file_tag|safe }} as {{ doc|std_level_prompt_with_article }}.
The IESG would also like the IRSG or RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker ({{ doc_url }}) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log.{% endif %}
A URL of this {{ doc_type }} is:
{{ doc_url }}
The process for such documents is described {% if doc.stream_id == 'ise' %}at https://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html {% else %}{% if doc.stream_id == 'irtf' %}in RFC 5743 {% endif %} {% endif %}
Thank you,
The IESG Secretary
{% endfilter %}
{% endautoescape %}