You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
feat: Render the document shepherd writeup templates at two new URLs (ietf-tools#4225)
* feat: Render the document shepherd writeup templates at two new URL.
Those being `/doc/shepherdwriteuptemplate/group` and
`/doc/shepherdwriteuptemplate/individual`.
* Address review comments from @jennifer-richards
* Fixes
* Remove debug statement
* Make bleach sanitizer not strip the `start` attribute of `ol` tags
Also rearrange the code a bit
* Don't sanitize the `python_markdown` output, it destroys wanted formatting
* Restore bleach
* Don't bleach tag `id`s.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: ietf/templates/doc/shepherd_writeup.txt
+5-5Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1
-
{# Keep in sync with https://github.com/ietf-chairs/chairs.ietf.org/blob/main/documents/qa-style-writeup-template.md #}{% if doc.stream %}{% if doc.stream.slug == 'ietf' %}# Document Shepherd Write-Up
1
+
{# Keep in sync with https://github.com/ietf-chairs/chairs.ietf.org/blob/main/documents/qa-style-writeup-template.md #}{% if stream %}{% if stream == 'ietf' %}# Document Shepherd Write-Up{% if type != "individ" %} for Group Documents{% else %} for Individual Documents{% endif %}
2
2
3
3
*This version is dated 4 July 2022.*
4
4
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Note that some numbered items contain multiple related questions; please be sure
13
13
to answer all of them.
14
14
15
15
## Document History
16
-
{% if doc.group.type.slug == 'individ' %}
16
+
{% if type == 'individ' %}
17
17
1. Was the document considered in any WG, and if so, why was it not adopted as a
18
18
work item there?
19
19
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ to answer all of them.
37
37
either in the document itself (as [RFC 7942][3] recommends) or elsewhere
38
38
(where)?
39
39
40
-
### Additional Reviews
40
+
## Additional Reviews
41
41
42
42
5. Do the contents of this document closely interact with technologies in other
43
43
IETF working groups or external organizations, and would it therefore benefit
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ to answer all of them.
58
58
final version of the document written in a formal language, such as XML code,
59
59
BNF rules, MIB definitions, CBOR's CDDL, etc.
60
60
61
-
### Document Shepherd Checks
61
+
## Document Shepherd Checks
62
62
63
63
9. Based on the shepherd's review of the document, is it their opinion that this
64
64
document is needed, clearly written, complete, correctly designed, and ready
{# Copyright The IETF Trust 2015, All Rights Reserved #}
3
+
{% load origin %}
4
+
{% load ietf_filters %}
5
+
{% load textfilters htmlfilters %}
6
+
{% block title %}Document Shepherd Write-Up{% if type == "group" %} for Group Documents{% elif type == "individual" %} for Individual Documents{% endif %}{% endblock %}
0 commit comments